Pinsa vs Pinsa
Overall, Pinsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pinsa | Pinsa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 263 kcal | 263 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 4.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinsa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pinsa lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pinsa
Weichweizenmehl 47 %, Wasser, Hartweizengrieẞ (5 %), Sauerteig 4,2% (Wasser, Weizenmehl), natives Olivenöl extra (3,5 %), Salz, Bierhefe, gemälztes Gerstenmehl, Ethylalkohol.
Pinsa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pinsa or Pinsa?
Overall, Pinsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinsa has fewer calories: 263 kcal versus 263 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinsa has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.