Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough vs Chocolate Chunk Cookie Dough
Overall, Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough
Chocolate Chunk Cookie Dough
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cook... | Chocolate Chunk Cookie Dough |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 435 kcal | 429 kcal |
| Fat | 15.2 g | 17.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 8.9 g |
| Sugars | 34.8 g | 35.7 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough has 15% less fat (15.2 g vs 17.9 g).
- Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough has 18% more fiber (4.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough has 18% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough
Flour Blend (oat, tapioca, potato starch), Sugar, Palm Oil**, Filtered Water, Natural Flavors, Vegetable Juice (for color), Sea Salt, Baking Soda
Chocolate Chunk Cookie Dough
Flour Blend (oat, tapioca, potato starch), Sugar, Palm Oil**, Chocolate Chunks (sugar, unsweetened chocolate, cocoa butter, vanilla, salt), Filtered Water, Molasses, Natural Flavors, Sea Salt, Baking Soda
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough or Chocolate Chunk Cookie Dough?
Overall, Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolate Chunk Cookie Dough has fewer calories: 429 kcal versus 435 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pink Heart Shapes Sugar Cookie Dough has less sugar: 34.8 g versus 35.7 g per 100 g.