Comparison

Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge vs Pineau des Charentes rouge 17% - Appellation Pineau des Charentes Contrôlée

Overall, Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPineau des Charentes Excelle...Pineau des Charentes rouge 1...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 18 kcal 79 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 3.9 g 18 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.2 g —
Protein 0.2 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge has 77% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 79 kcal).
  • Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge has 92% less fat (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge has 78% less sugar (3.9 g vs 18 g).
  • Pineau des Charentes rouge 17% - Appellation Pineau des Charentes Contrôlée has 64% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Only Pineau des Charentes rouge 17% - Appellation Pineau des Charentes Contrôlée lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge

cognac, jus de raisin

Pineau des Charentes rouge 17% - Appellation Pineau des Charentes Contrôlée

Raisins, eau-de-vie de Cognac, conservateurs (SULFITES).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge or Pineau des Charentes rouge 17% - Appellation Pineau des Charentes Contrôlée?

Overall, Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pineau des Charentes Excellence Rouge has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 18 g per 100 g.

More comparisons