Comparison
Pieds et paquets vs Pieds et paquets
Overall, Pieds et paquets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pieds et paquets | Pieds et paquets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 265 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 21.6 g | 8.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 11.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pieds et paquets has 49% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 265 kcal).
- Pieds et paquets has 63% less fat (8.1 g vs 21.6 g).
- Pieds et paquets has 79% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 7.6 g).
- Pieds et paquets has 88% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pieds et paquets has 30% more protein (16.7 g vs 11.7 g).
- Pieds et paquets has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pieds et paquets
Not available.
Pieds et paquets
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pieds et paquets or Pieds et paquets?
Overall, Pieds et paquets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pieds et paquets has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 265 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pieds et paquets has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.