Comparison
Picodon vs Picodon
Overall, Picodon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Picodon | Picodon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 317 kcal | 335 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Picodon has 11% less saturated fat (17 g vs 19 g).
- Picodon has 46% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Picodon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Picodon
Not available.
Picodon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Picodon or Picodon?
Overall, Picodon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Picodon has fewer calories: 317 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Picodon has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.