Petits Bâton De Berger Nature vs Saucisson sec - Tranches fines
Overall, Petits Bâton De Berger Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Petits Bâton De Berger Nature
Saucisson sec - Tranches fines
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petits Bâton De Berger Natur... | Saucisson sec - Tranches fin... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 465 kcal | 429 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 4.8 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Petits Bâton De Berger Nature has 32% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.8 g).
- Petits Bâton De Berger Nature has 11% more protein (28 g vs 25 g).
Ingredients
Petits Bâton De Berger Nature
Viande de porc (origine: UE), sel, LACTOSE, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, antioxydant: acide ascorbique, conservateur: nitrite de sodium, ferments. Enveloppe : alginate de sodium, cellulose ou collagène. 180g de viande utilisés pour la préparation de 100g de produit fini.
Saucisson sec - Tranches fines
Viande de porc (Origine UE), sel, lactose (lait), épices dextrose, sucre, antioxydant: acide ascorbique conservateur: nitrate de potassium, ferments. 145g de viande utilisés pour la préparation de 100g de produit fini. Présence possible de fruits à coques.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petits Bâton De Berger Nature or Saucisson sec - Tranches fines?
Overall, Petits Bâton De Berger Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisson sec - Tranches fines has fewer calories: 429 kcal versus 465 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petits Bâton De Berger Nature has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.