Pepsi vs Pepsi 2L
Overall, Pepsi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pepsi | Pepsi 2L |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pepsi has 57% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Pepsi has 58% less sugar (4.6 g vs 11 g).
- Pepsi has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pepsi
Wasser, Zucker, Kohlensäure, Farbstoff E150d, Aroma, Säuerungsmittel Phosphorsäure, Süßungsmittel (Acesulfam K, Sucralose), Aroma Koffein.
Pepsi 2L
eau gazeifiée, sucre, édulcorants, acidulants (acide phosphorique, acide citrique), arômes naturels, conservateur (sorbate de potassium), caféine, émulsifiant (gomme arabique)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pepsi or Pepsi 2L?
Overall, Pepsi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pepsi has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pepsi has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 11 g per 100 g.