Comparison

Pâtes alphabet à la bolognaise vs Carotte poulet 6 mois

Overall, Carotte poulet 6 mois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPâtes alphabet à la bolognai...Carotte poulet 6 mois
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 70 kcal 54 kcal
Fat 2.4 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.5 g 0.1 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber 0.9 g —
Protein 2.7 g 2.4 g
Additives20
AllergensCelery, Eggs, GlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carotte poulet 6 mois has 23% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 70 kcal).
  • Carotte poulet 6 mois has 96% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Carotte poulet 6 mois has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Carotte poulet 6 mois has 93% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Pâtes alphabet à la bolognaise has 11% more protein (2.7 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Only Pâtes alphabet à la bolognaise lists: Celery, Eggs, Gluten.

Ingredients

Pâtes alphabet à la bolognaise

Légumes* 46% (tomates* 35%, carottes*, oignons*, _céleri_*), pâtes* cuites (semoule de _blé_ dur* et blanc d'_œufs_* de poules, _œufs_*) 42%, bœuf* 5%, farine de riz*, concentré de tomates*, huile de tournesol*, sel iodé, aromates* (origan*, ail*, poivre*, romarin*), antioxygènes (acide ascorbique, extrait riche en tocophérol**). *Produits issus de l'Agriculture Biologique. **Extrait naturel de plantes.

Carotte poulet 6 mois

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pâtes alphabet à la bolognaise or Carotte poulet 6 mois?

Overall, Carotte poulet 6 mois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carotte poulet 6 mois has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carotte poulet 6 mois has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons