Pate de piment vert citron vs Pate de piment vert gingembre
Overall, Pate de piment vert citron has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Pate de piment vert citron
Pate de piment vert gingembre
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de piment vert citron | Pate de piment vert gingembr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 65 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 8.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Dioxyde de soufre et sulfites | Dioxyde de soufre et sulfites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de piment vert citron has 32% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 65 kcal).
- Pate de piment vert citron has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Pate de piment vert gingembre has 16% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.2 g).
- Pate de piment vert citron has 54% less salt (3.9 g vs 8.4 g).
- Pate de piment vert gingembre has 52% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.1 g).
- Pate de piment vert citron has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pate de piment vert citron
Citron (50%), piment vert (32,2%), gingembre, sel, vinaigre, huile de tournesol, combava, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Pate de piment vert gingembre
Piment vert (41%), gingembre mangue (34%), ail, sel, vinaigre, huile de tournesol, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de piment vert citron or Pate de piment vert gingembre?
Overall, Pate de piment vert citron has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de piment vert citron has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 65 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de piment vert gingembre has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.