Comparison
Paška sol sitna vs Salt 125g
Overall, Paška sol sitna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paška sol sitna | Salt 125g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 83.9 g | 97.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paška sol sitna has 14% less salt (83.9 g vs 97.5 g).
Ingredients
Paška sol sitna
Meersalz.
Salt 125g
Havsaltflak
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paška sol sitna or Salt 125g?
Overall, Paška sol sitna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paška sol sitna has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 0 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paška sol sitna has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.