Papa Monterojo Sal Rsd vs Mini Pandeyucas
Overall, Mini Pandeyucas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Papa Monterojo Sal Rsd | Mini Pandeyucas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 315 kcal | 246 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 8.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 56 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mini Pandeyucas has 22% fewer calories (246 kcal vs 315 kcal).
- Mini Pandeyucas has 73% less fat (8.9 g vs 33 g).
- Mini Pandeyucas has 58% less saturated fat (5 g vs 12 g).
- Mini Pandeyucas has no sugar, while Papa Monterojo Sal Rsd has 56 g.
- Mini Pandeyucas has 82% less salt (0.8 g vs 4.3 g).
- Mini Pandeyucas has 82% more protein (5.5 g vs 1 g).
- Mini Pandeyucas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mini Pandeyucas lists: Eggs, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Papa Monterojo Sal Rsd
Not available.
Mini Pandeyucas
Premezcla pan de yuca almidon de yuca modificado, almidon de maíz, quesofresco _leche_ fresca, cuajo, sal y estabilizante cloruro de calcio, margarina y _huevo_. Este producto contiene _huevo_, _lácteos_ y _soya_. fue empacado en una linea de produccion que procesa nueces, maní, almendra y sésamo.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Papa Monterojo Sal Rsd or Mini Pandeyucas?
Overall, Mini Pandeyucas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mini Pandeyucas has fewer calories: 246 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mini Pandeyucas has less sugar: 0 g versus 56 g per 100 g.