Panais carottes quinoa et poulet vs Carottes des Landes de Gascogne
Overall, Carottes des Landes de Gascogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Panais carottes quinoa et poulet
Better choice
Carottes des Landes de Gascogne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panais carottes quinoa et po... | Carottes des Landes de Gasco... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 43 kcal | 36 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carottes des Landes de Gascogne has 16% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 43 kcal).
- Carottes des Landes de Gascogne has 70% less fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Panais carottes quinoa et poulet has 68% less sugar (2.1 g vs 6.6 g).
- Carottes des Landes de Gascogne has 33% more fiber (2.7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Panais carottes quinoa et poulet has 56% more protein (1.8 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Panais carottes quinoa et poulet
Du panais* 30%, des carottes* 30%, de l'eau de cuisson, du quinoa cuit* 12% (eau, quinoa*), de la viande de poulet* 8%, de la ciboulette* et c'est tout ! *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique. Peut contenir du gluten.
Carottes des Landes de Gascogne
carottes
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panais carottes quinoa et poulet or Carottes des Landes de Gascogne?
Overall, Carottes des Landes de Gascogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carottes des Landes de Gascogne has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panais carottes quinoa et poulet has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.