Comparison

Ovomaltine vs Timings & co

Overall, Ovomaltine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOvomaltineTimings & co
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 376 kcal 376 kcal
Fat 2 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.9 g
Sugars 51.1 g 51.1 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.5 g
Fiber 4 g 0 g
Protein 9.4 g 9.5 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ovomaltine has 100% more fiber (4 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Ovomaltine

Extrait de malt d'ORGE (51%), LAIT écrémé concentré (10%), lactosérum concentré (LAIT), cacao maigre en poudre (13%), sucre, fructose, sels minéraux (carbonate de magnésium, phosphate de calcium), huile de colza, vitamines (A, E, C, thiamine : BI, riboflavine: B2 niacine: PP, B6, acide folique: B9, B12, biotine: B8, acide pantothénique : B5), sel, arôme: vaniline

Timings & co

Extrait de malt d'orge 51%, lait écrémé concentré (lait), lactosérum concentré, cacao maigre en poudre 13%, sucre, fructose, minéraux (carbonate de magnésium, phosphate de calcium), huile de colza, vitamines (E, C, thiamine : B1, riboflavine : B2, niacine : PP, B6, acide folique : B9, B12, biotine : B8, acide pantothénique B5), sel, arôme (vanilline).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ovomaltine or Timings & co?

Overall, Ovomaltine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ovomaltine has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 376 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ovomaltine has less sugar: 51.1 g versus 51.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons