Comparison
Old Nick vs Rhum ambré
Overall, Old Nick has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Old Nick | Rhum ambré |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 8 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Old Nick has no calories, while Rhum ambré has 8 kcal.
- Rhum ambré has 100% more protein (1 g vs 0 g).
- Old Nick is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Old Nick
white rum
Rhum ambré
Boisson à base de rhum des caraïbes (90,9%) et arômes naturels.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Old Nick or Rhum ambré?
Overall, Old Nick has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Old Nick has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Old Nick has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.