Öl Frittieröl vs Huile pour friture
Overall, Öl Frittieröl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Öl Frittieröl | Huile pour friture |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 828 kcal | 900 kcal |
| Fat | 92 g | 100 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Diméthylpolysiloxane: E900, Plus connu sous le nom de Silicone, Utilisé aussi dans la restauration rapide! Contiendrait des Nanoparticules (V. Gouget). A éviter. | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Öl Frittieröl has 10% less saturated fat (9 g vs 10 g).
- Öl Frittieröl has no sugar, while Huile pour friture has 0.5 g.
- Huile pour friture has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Huile pour friture has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Öl Frittieröl has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Öl Frittieröl lists: Diméthylpolysiloxane: E900, Plus connu sous le nom de Silicone, Utilisé aussi dans la restauration rapide! Contiendrait des Nanoparticules (V. Gouget). A éviter..
Ingredients
Öl Frittieröl
Huile de tournesol, huile de colza, huile de tournesol à haute teneur en acide oléique, huile de maïs. Antimoussant : diméthylpolysiloxane
Huile pour friture
Huile de tournesol, huile de colza, huile de tournesol à haute teneur en acide oléique, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Öl Frittieröl or Huile pour friture?
Overall, Öl Frittieröl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Öl Frittieröl has fewer calories: 828 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Öl Frittieröl has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.