Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs vs Nouilles en nid
Overall, Nouilles en nid has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs
Nouilles en nid
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nouilles recette asiatique a... | Nouilles en nid |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 363 kcal | 135 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nouilles en nid has 63% fewer calories (135 kcal vs 363 kcal).
- Nouilles en nid has 73% less fat (0.8 g vs 3 g).
- Nouilles en nid has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Nouilles en nid has 66% less sugar (1.2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Nouilles en nid has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs has 52% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs has 60% more protein (12.5 g vs 5 g).
- Nouilles en nid has the better Nutri-Score.
- Nouilles en nid is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs
Farine de BLÉ tendre (58%) - farine de BLÉ dur - OEUFS (15%) - sel - correcteur d'acidité : carbonate de potassium. Traces de SOJA, LAIT et SÉSAME.
Nouilles en nid
Semoule de _blé_ dur, _œuf_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs or Nouilles en nid?
Overall, Nouilles en nid has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nouilles en nid has fewer calories: 135 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nouilles en nid has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.