Non-alcoholic beer vs Munkholm alkoholfri øl
Overall, Non-alcoholic beer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Non-alcoholic beer | Munkholm alkoholfri øl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 23 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Non-alcoholic beer has no calories, while Munkholm alkoholfri øl has 23 kcal.
- Non-alcoholic beer has 77% less sugar (0.7 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Non-alcoholic beer
Water, barley malt, maize, sugar, hops, natural flavours. Not more than 0.05% alcohol
Munkholm alkoholfri øl
Vann, maltet bygg, humle, karbondioksid, surhetsregulerende middel (melkesyre), antioksidant (askorbinsyre)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Non-alcoholic beer or Munkholm alkoholfri øl?
Overall, Non-alcoholic beer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Non-alcoholic beer has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 23 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Non-alcoholic beer has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 3 g per 100 g.