Noix de coco givrees vs Sorbet plein fruit coco
Overall, Sorbet plein fruit coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Noix de coco givrees | Sorbet plein fruit coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 212 kcal | 117 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 19 g | 19.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | — |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sorbet plein fruit coco has 45% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 212 kcal).
- Sorbet plein fruit coco has 69% less fat (4.3 g vs 14 g).
- Sorbet plein fruit coco has 69% less saturated fat (4 g vs 13 g).
- Noix de coco givrees has 92% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.1 g).
- Sorbet plein fruit coco has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Noix de coco givrees lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Noix de coco givrees
Lait de noix de coco (extrait de noix de coco 33,2%, eau), eau, sucre, sirop de glucose de blé en poudre, noix de coco râpée 2,1%, protéines de pois hydrolysées, gélifiant pectines, épaississant gomme xanthane, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras d'origine végétale. Produit élaboré dans un atelier qui utilise : gluten, oeuf, soja, lait, fruits à coque, sésame.
Sorbet plein fruit coco
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Noix de coco givrees or Sorbet plein fruit coco?
Overall, Sorbet plein fruit coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sorbet plein fruit coco has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 212 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Noix de coco givrees has less sugar: 19 g versus 19.2 g per 100 g.