Nestea bajo en calorías vs Pepsi bresil
Overall, Nestea bajo en calorías has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nestea bajo en calorías | Pepsi bresil |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 88 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 22 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nestea bajo en calorías has 78% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 88 kcal).
- Nestea bajo en calorías has 80% less sugar (4.5 g vs 22 g).
Ingredients
Nestea bajo en calorías
Água, açúcar, reguladores de videz icido cítrico e citrato de sódio, extracto de di proto (0.12), sumo de limão proveniente de concentrado (0,12), antioxidante ácido ascórbica Mulcorantes, acessulfame Ke sucralose romas naturais. INFORMAÇÃO NUTRICIONAL 100ml 80 kJ/19 kcal 264 kJ/63 kcal 0g #1 sonals $1 BETET (%
Pepsi bresil
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nestea bajo en calorías or Pepsi bresil?
Overall, Nestea bajo en calorías has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nestea bajo en calorías has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 88 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nestea bajo en calorías has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 22 g per 100 g.