Comparison

NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g vs NESCAFE SPECIAL FILTRE L'Original, Café Soluble, Flacon de 200g

Overall, NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientNESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Ca...NESCAFE SPECIAL FILTRE L'Ori...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 2 kcal 310 kcal
Fat 0 g 1.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 19.8 g 20 g
Protein 0 g 20.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g has 99% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 310 kcal).
  • NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g has no fat, while NESCAFE SPECIAL FILTRE L'Original, Café Soluble, Flacon de 200g has 1.2 g.
  • NESCAFE SPECIAL FILTRE L'Original, Café Soluble, Flacon de 200g has 100% more protein (20.3 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g

Café 100% pur Arabica.

NESCAFE SPECIAL FILTRE L'Original, Café Soluble, Flacon de 200g

Café instantané

FAQ

Which is healthier: NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g or NESCAFE SPECIAL FILTRE L'Original, Café Soluble, Flacon de 200g?

Overall, NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 310 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

NESCAFÉ Espresso Intenso, Café Soluble 100% pur Arabica, 25x1,8g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons