Comparison
Naudan maksaviipale vs Foie de boeuf
Overall, Foie de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Naudan maksaviipale | Foie de boeuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 153 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 19 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Foie de boeuf has 16% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 153 kcal).
- Foie de boeuf has 40% less fat (3.6 g vs 6 g).
Ingredients
Naudan maksaviipale
Suomalaista naudan maksaa
Foie de boeuf
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Naudan maksaviipale or Foie de boeuf?
Overall, Foie de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Foie de boeuf has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Naudan maksaviipale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.