Multi-Vitamin vs Robinsons Orange Squash
Overall, Robinsons Orange Squash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Multi-Vitamin | Robinsons Orange Squash |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 7 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 7 |
| Allergens | Kiwi | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Robinsons Orange Squash has 77% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 30 kcal).
- Robinsons Orange Squash has no fat, while Multi-Vitamin has 0.5 g.
- Robinsons Orange Squash has 92% less sugar (0.6 g vs 7.1 g).
- Multi-Vitamin has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Robinsons Orange Squash has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Multi-Vitamin lists: Kiwi.
Ingredients
Multi-Vitamin
Kildevand, frugtsaft fra koncentrat 10% (citron 4,7%, appelsin 2,7%, æble 1,3%, ananas 0,6%, banan 0,4%, kiwi 0,2%, passionsfrugt 0,1%), sukker, vitaminer: vitamin C, niacin, vitamin E vitamin B6, thiamin/ B1, biotin, naturlig aroma, antioxidant (ascorbinsyre),
Robinsons Orange Squash
Water, orange fruit from concentrate (10%), acid (citric acid), acidity regulator (sodium citrate), natural flavouring, sweeteners (aspartame, saccharin), preservatives (potassium sorbate, sodium metabisulphite), stabiliser (cellulose gum), emulsifier (gl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Multi-Vitamin or Robinsons Orange Squash?
Overall, Robinsons Orange Squash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Robinsons Orange Squash has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Robinsons Orange Squash has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.