Comparison

Mousse de Canard au porto vs Mousse de canard

Overall, Mousse de Canard au porto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMousse de Canard au portoMousse de canard
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 399 kcal 393 kcal
Fat 39 g 38 g
Saturated fat 14 g 13 g
Sugars 1.1 g 1.2 g
Salt 1.4 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 9.6 g 8.5 g
Additives23
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mousse de Canard au porto has 18% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Mousse de Canard au porto has 11% more protein (9.6 g vs 8.5 g).

Ingredients

Mousse de Canard au porto

Gras de porc (origine : France), foie maigre de canard (origine : UE) 20%, foie de poulet (origine : UE), graisse de canard (origine : UE) 10%, saindoux (origine : France), eau, CRÈME fraîche, sel, sucre, porto dénaturé 0,9% (porto, sel), OEUFS, farine de BLÉ, poivre, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium, huile de paprika, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.

Mousse de canard

Mousse de canard de qualite superieure gras de porc, foie de canard (20%), graisse de canard (15%), couenne de porc, foie de poulet, eau, {allergene}oeufs{/allergene} entiers frais, creme (llait), amidon, farine de {allergene}ble{/allergene}, porto (2%), sel, armagnac (1%), epices, saccharose, plantes aromatiques, antioxydants : e300-e316, conservateur : e250.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mousse de Canard au porto or Mousse de canard?

Overall, Mousse de Canard au porto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mousse de canard has fewer calories: 393 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mousse de Canard au porto has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons