Comparison

Morceaux à dévorer vs Carotte poulet 6 mois

Overall, Carotte poulet 6 mois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMorceaux à dévorerCarotte poulet 6 mois
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — —
Calories 71 kcal 54 kcal
Fat 2.6 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 2.1 g 0.1 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber 1.3 g —
Protein 2.7 g 2.4 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carotte poulet 6 mois has 24% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 71 kcal).
  • Carotte poulet 6 mois has 96% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Carotte poulet 6 mois has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Carotte poulet 6 mois has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Morceaux à dévorer has 11% more protein (2.7 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Only Morceaux à dévorer lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Morceaux à dévorer

Carottes 22,00 % - Eau - Haricots verts 9,00 %-Riz précuit 8,40 % - Préparation de viande de bœuf hachée précuite (Origine France) 8,70 % (viande de bœuf 8,00 %, eau, fécule de pomme de terre) - Oignons-Coulis de tomates 6,30 % - Panais - Crème fraîche (LAT) - Amidon de riz - Huile de colza - Gélifiant : Gomme de guar-Sel-Ail - Oignons - Herbes aromatiques-Poireaux en poudre. Peut contenir des fraces de GLUTEN, de POISSON, de MOUTARDE, de CELERI, de SOJA et de MOLLUSQUES. 29971 Pour 100 g

Carotte poulet 6 mois

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Morceaux à dévorer or Carotte poulet 6 mois?

Overall, Carotte poulet 6 mois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carotte poulet 6 mois has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carotte poulet 6 mois has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons