Misto funghi con porcini e speck vs Mélange tradition
Overall, Mélange tradition has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Misto funghi con porcini e s... | Mélange tradition |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mélange tradition has 41% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Mélange tradition has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Misto funghi con porcini e speck has 50% more protein (2.8 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Misto funghi con porcini e speck
30% funghi Champignon (Agaricus bisporus), 13,3% funghi Shiitake (Lentinula edodes), 13,3% funghi Pleurotus (Pleurotus ostreatus), 13,3% funghi Nameko (Pholiota nameko), 10% melanzane a cubetti, 10% speck a cubetti, 10% funghi Porcini (Boletus edulis e relativo gruppo).
Mélange tradition
Bolets jaunes 28 % (Boletus luteus), pleurotes en huître 15 % (Pleurotus ostreatus), champignons de Paris 15 % (Psalliota bispora), pholiotes 15 % (Pholiota nameko mutabilis), lentins de chêne 14 % (Lentinus edodes), cèpes 8 % (Boletus edulis et groupe relatif), bolets bai 5 % (Boletus badius).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Misto funghi con porcini e speck or Mélange tradition?
Overall, Mélange tradition has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mélange tradition has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Misto funghi con porcini e speck has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.