Comparison

Milk Chocolate Florentines vs Les Florentins ® Chocolat noir et caramel au beurre salé

Overall, Milk Chocolate Florentines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMilk Chocolate FlorentinesLes Florentins ® Chocolat no...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 538 kcal 506 kcal
Fat 35 g 27.7 g
Saturated fat 15 g 13.8 g
Sugars 42 g 55.5 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.6 g
Fiber 2.8 g 2.8 g
Protein 7.6 g 4.9 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Les Florentins ® Chocolat noir et caramel au beurre salé has 21% less fat (27.7 g vs 35 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Florentines has 24% less sugar (42 g vs 55.5 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Florentines has 53% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Florentines has 36% more protein (7.6 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Only Les Florentins ® Chocolat noir et caramel au beurre salé lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Milk Chocolate Florentines

Not available.

Les Florentins ® Chocolat noir et caramel au beurre salé

Chocolat 24% (pâte de cacao 55%, sucre, _beurre_ de cacao, lécithine de _soja_), _crème_ fraiche, sucre, cubes de caramel au beurre salé (écorces d'orange, saccharose, E330), amandes effilées, miel, sirop de glucose, raisins secs, beurre frais, arôme caramel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Florentines or Les Florentins ® Chocolat noir et caramel au beurre salé?

Overall, Milk Chocolate Florentines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Les Florentins ® Chocolat noir et caramel au beurre salé has fewer calories: 506 kcal versus 538 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Milk Chocolate Florentines has less sugar: 42 g versus 55.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons