Comparison
Miel de Fleurs vs Bloemenhoning
Overall, Bloemenhoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Miel de Fleurs | Bloemenhoning |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 302 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 78 g | 75 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miel de Fleurs has 60% more protein (1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Bloemenhoning has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Miel de Fleurs
Not available.
Bloemenhoning
bloemenhoning.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Miel de Fleurs or Bloemenhoning?
Overall, Bloemenhoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bloemenhoning has fewer calories: 302 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bloemenhoning has less sugar: 75 g versus 78 g per 100 g.