Comparison
Mazare Mica vs Erbsen
Overall, Erbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mazare Mica | Erbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 74 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Erbsen has 57% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Mazare Mica has 16% less sugar (2.6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Erbsen has 89% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Erbsen has 87% more fiber (5.4 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Mazare Mica
Garden peas, water, sugar, salt.
Erbsen
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mazare Mica or Erbsen?
Overall, Erbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Erbsen has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 74 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mazare Mica has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.