Comparison

Maślanka truskawkowa vs Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer

Overall, Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientMaślanka truskawkowaBio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdb...
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 70 kcal 63 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 11 g 11 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Protein 3.2 g 2.8 g
Additives20
AllergensGluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer has 11% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 70 kcal).
  • Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer has 47% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Maślanka truskawkowa has 13% more protein (3.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Maślanka truskawkowa lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Maślanka truskawkowa

_mleko_ pasteryzowane, _maślanka_ naturalna, wsad owocowy truskawka (truskawki 2.45%, syrop glukozowo-fruktozowy z _pszenicy_, cukier, skrobia modyfikowana kukurydziana, koncentrat soku z buraka ćwikłowego, aromaty, stabilizator: pektyny, barwnik: karminowy), cukier, _mleko_ odtłuszczone w proszku, _serwatka_ w proszku, skrobia modyfikowana, stabilizator: pektyny, żywe kultury bakterii mlekowych

Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Maślanka truskawkowa or Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer?

Overall, Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Buttermilch Himbeer-Erdbeer has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Maślanka truskawkowa has less sugar: 11 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons