Comparison

Marja Puree kuningatar vs Lime & Veriappelsiini Sorbetti

Overall, Marja Puree kuningatar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMarja Puree kuningatarLime & Veriappelsiini Sorbet...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 99 kcal 185 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 4.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1 g
Sugars 18 g 22 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.9 g —
Protein 0.8 g 0.3 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Marja Puree kuningatar has 46% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 185 kcal).
  • Marja Puree kuningatar has 80% less fat (0.9 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Marja Puree kuningatar has no saturated fat, while Lime & Veriappelsiini Sorbetti has 1 g.
  • Marja Puree kuningatar has 18% less sugar (18 g vs 22 g).
  • Marja Puree kuningatar has 63% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.3 g).

Ingredients

Marja Puree kuningatar

Metsämustikka 65 %, vadelma 20%, nestesokeri (sokeria 11 % ja vettä), sakeuttamisaine guarkumi

Lime & Veriappelsiini Sorbetti

Limejuice (21 %), blodapelsinjuice (21 %), vatten, glukossirap, socker, dextros, potatisstärkelse, rypsolja, rispulver (rissirappulver, risstärkelse, rismjöl), emulgeringsmedel (mono - och diglycerider av fettsyror), förtjockningsmedel (fruktkärnmjol). Vegansk. Glutenfri. Kan innehålla spår av mjölk, ägg, jordnötter, cashewnötter, hasselnötter, pekannötter, mandel och pistage.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Marja Puree kuningatar or Lime & Veriappelsiini Sorbetti?

Overall, Marja Puree kuningatar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Marja Puree kuningatar has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Marja Puree kuningatar has less sugar: 18 g versus 22 g per 100 g.

More comparisons