Comparison

Marinés 2 PAVES vs Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio

Overall, Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMarinés 2 PAVESCheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 112 kcal 133 kcal
Fat 3.1 g 5 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 1.8 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0 g
Protein 19 g 22 g
Additives40
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Marinés 2 PAVES has 16% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 133 kcal).
  • Marinés 2 PAVES has 38% less fat (3.1 g vs 5 g).
  • Marinés 2 PAVES has 28% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio has no sugar, while Marinés 2 PAVES has 0.7 g.
  • Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio has 80% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio has 14% more protein (22 g vs 19 g).
  • Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Marinés 2 PAVES

89% viande bovine (origine : France), eau, sel, maltodextrine, sucre, plantes aromatiques (dont 0,1% échalote), sucre caramélisé, épices, acidifiants : acétates de sodium, acide citrique, citrates de sodium, arômes,fibres végétales antioxydants : acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, extrait de levure, extrait d'épices, poive.

Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio

100% viande bovine bio Pourcentage de matières grasses inférieur à 5%. Papport collagène sur protéines de viande inférieur à 12%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Marinés 2 PAVES or Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio?

Overall, Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Marinés 2 PAVES has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 133 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cheveux d'ange Bœuf Bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons