Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest vs Magret de Canard du Sud-Ouest séché
Overall, Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest
Magret de Canard du Sud-Ouest séché
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Marget de Canard du Sud-Oues... | Magret de Canard du Sud-Oues... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 323 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.2 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest has 15% fewer calories (323 kcal vs 380 kcal).
- Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest has 13% less fat (27 g vs 31 g).
- Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest has 23% less saturated fat (9.2 g vs 12 g).
- Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Magret de Canard du Sud-Ouest séché has 13% more protein (23 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest
Magret de canard du Sud-Ouest (Origine France), sel, épices 0,21%, ferments.
Magret de Canard du Sud-Ouest séché
Magret de canard du Sud Ouest, sel, poivre, coriandre, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments. Viande de canard Origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest or Magret de Canard du Sud-Ouest séché?
Overall, Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest has fewer calories: 323 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Marget de Canard du Sud-Ouest has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.