Comparison

Maltesers vs Celebrations Bottle

Overall, Maltesers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMaltesersCelebrations Bottle
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 503 kcal 495 kcal
Fat 24 g 24 g
Saturated fat 15 g 14 g
Sugars 53 g 55 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.4 g
Fiber 1.2 g —
Protein 8.5 g 5.6 g
Additives75
AllergensGluten, Milk, Soybeans, Blé, Lait, OrgeEggs, Gluten, Milk, Peanuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Maltesers has 34% more protein (8.5 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Only Maltesers lists: Blé, Lait, Orge.
  • Only Celebrations Bottle lists: Eggs, Peanuts.

Ingredients

Maltesers

Sucre, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, beurre de cacao, sirop de glucose, extrait de malt d'_orge_, pâte de cacao, matière grasse de palme, perméat de lactosérum (_lait_), matière grasse du _lait_, émulsifiants (lécithine de _soja_, E492), matière grasse de palmiste, farine de _blé_, poudres à lever (E341, E500, E501), gluten de _blé_, petit-_lait_ doux en poudre (_lait_), sel, agent d'enrobage (pectines).

Celebrations Bottle

Suiker, glucosestroop, magere MELKPOEDER, cacaoboter, cacaomassa, palmvet, weipermeaat (MELK), botervet (MELK), PINDA'S, kokos, TARWEMEEL, zonnebloemolie, emulgatoren (SOJALECITHINE, E471), GERSTEMOUTEXTRACT, zout, magere cacao poeder, bevochtigingsmiddel (glycerol), KIPPENEI-EIWITPOEDER, rijsmiddelen (E500, E341, E501), TARWEGLUTEN, zoet weipoeder (MELK), aroma

FAQ

Which is healthier: Maltesers or Celebrations Bottle?

Overall, Maltesers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Celebrations Bottle has fewer calories: 495 kcal versus 503 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Maltesers has less sugar: 53 g versus 55 g per 100 g.

More comparisons