Comparison
Malaga vs Vino Abadía Tinto
Overall, Malaga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Malaga | Vino Abadía Tinto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Malaga has no calories, while Vino Abadía Tinto has 11 kcal.
- Malaga has no sugar, while Vino Abadía Tinto has 0.6 g.
- Only Malaga lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Malaga
Vin de liqueur. Contient des _sulfites_
Vino Abadía Tinto
vin rouge
FAQ
Which is healthier: Malaga or Vino Abadía Tinto?
Overall, Malaga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Malaga has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Malaga has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.