Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g vs Pepinillos agridulces
Overall, Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g
Pepinillos agridulces
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal... | Pepinillos agridulces |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g has 61% fewer calories (22 kcal vs 56 kcal).
- Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 11 g).
- Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g has 63% more fiber (2.7 g vs 1 g).
- Only Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g
Cornichons (dont SULFITES), vinaigre d'alcool, oignon, sel, graines de MOUTARDE, graines de coriandre, arôme naturel.
Pepinillos agridulces
Pepinillos, agua, azúcar, vinagre, sal, especias (cebolla, semillas de mostaza, eneldo, pimienta negra), aromas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g or Pepinillos agridulces?
Overall, Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g has fewer calories: 22 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maille Cornichons Fins Bocal 300g has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 11 g per 100 g.