Magnésium + Effercescent vs Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e.
Overall, Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Magnésium + Effercescent
Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Magnésium + Effercescent | Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 5 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 8 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e. has no calories, while Magnésium + Effercescent has 5 kcal.
Ingredients
Magnésium + Effercescent
Edulcorant : sorbitol; acidifiant : acide citrique; minéral : oxyde de magnésium : correcteur d'acidité : bicarbonate de sodium ; arôme naturel d'orange : anti-agglomérant : polyéthylène glycol : édulcorant: saccharine; vitamines: B1, B2, B6, B12 ; édulcorants : acésulfame de potassium, glycosides de stéviol ; vitamine B9.
Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e.
Füllstoff Calciumcarbonat, Füllstoff mikrokristalline Cellulose, Maltodextrin, Überzugsmittel Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, Füllstoff Isomalt, Trennmittel Magnesiumsalze der Speisefettsäuren, mittelkettige Triglyceride, Vitamin K, Vitamin D, Überzugsmittel Carnaubawachs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Magnésium + Effercescent or Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e.?
Overall, Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e. has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 5 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vitamin K2 + D3 2500 I.e. has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.