Comparison
Magnesio potassio vs Coupe faim
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Magnesio potassio | Coupe faim |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 412 kcal | 9 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 99 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coupe faim has 98% fewer calories (9 kcal vs 412 kcal).
- Magnesio potassio has 99% more protein (99 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Magnesio potassio
Mangesio, potasio
Coupe faim
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Magnesio potassio or Coupe faim?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coupe faim has fewer calories: 9 kcal versus 412 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Magnesio potassio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.