Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g vs Lustucru gnocchi a poeler star 500g
Overall, Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g
Lustucru gnocchi a poeler star 500g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lustucru mini gnocchi a poel... | Lustucru gnocchi a poeler st... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 5.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g has 14% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
Ingredients
Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g
Purée (eau, pommes de terre déshydratées, épice : curcuma), semoule de BLE, farine de BLE, huile de colza, sel. Peut contenir des traces de lait, œufs, soja, moutarde et gluten provenant d'autres céréales. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice
Lustucru gnocchi a poeler star 500g
Purée (eau, pommes de terre déshydratées, épice : curcuma), semoule de BLE, farine de BLE, huile de colza, sel. Peut contenir des traces de lait, œufs, soja, moutarde et gluten provenant d'autres céréales. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g or Lustucru gnocchi a poeler star 500g?
Overall, Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 202 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lustucru mini gnocchi a poeler 300g has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.