Lussac Saint-Emilion 2012 vs Chapelle Saint-Pierre
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lussac Saint-Emilion 2012 | Chapelle Saint-Pierre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 15 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Lussac Saint-Emilion 2012
Raisins noirs
Chapelle Saint-Pierre
Raisins noirs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lussac Saint-Emilion 2012 or Chapelle Saint-Pierre?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lussac Saint-Emilion 2012 has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lussac Saint-Emilion 2012 has less sugar: 15 g versus 15 g per 100 g.