Comparison

Lübecker Edelmarzipan vs Lübecker Edel-Marzipan

Overall, Lübecker Edel-Marzipan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLübecker EdelmarzipanLübecker Edel-Marzipan
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 484 kcal 483 kcal
Fat 29 g 28 g
Saturated fat 6.9 g 5.7 g
Sugars 42 g 44 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.7 g 7 g
Protein 9.6 g 9.7 g
Additives31
AllergensMilk, Nuts, SoybeansEggs, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lübecker Edel-Marzipan has 17% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Lübecker Edel-Marzipan has 47% more fiber (7 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Lübecker Edel-Marzipan has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Lübecker Edelmarzipan lists: Milk, Soybeans.
  • Only Lübecker Edel-Marzipan lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Lübecker Edelmarzipan

Zucker, _Mandeln_ gemahlen (36%), Kakaomasse, Wasser, Kakaobutter, Orangenlikör, Orangenschalen (0,4%), Glukosesirup, Emulgator: Lecithine (_Soja_), Kaffeepulver (0,07%), _Sahnepulver_ (0,07%), Feuchthaltemittel: Invertase, natürliches Orangen Aroma, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Kann Haselnüsse, Walnüsse, Pistazien, Weizen, Gerste und Ei enthalten, Das Produkt enthält Alkohol,

Lübecker Edel-Marzipan

Zucker, Mandeln gemahlen (39 %), Kakaomasse Wa Kakaobutter, Emulgator: Lecithine (Sojal: Feuchthaltemittel Invertase Kann Haselnüsse, Walnüsse, Pistazien, Weizen, Gerste, Milcherzeug nisse und Ei enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lübecker Edelmarzipan or Lübecker Edel-Marzipan?

Overall, Lübecker Edel-Marzipan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lübecker Edel-Marzipan has fewer calories: 483 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lübecker Edelmarzipan has less sugar: 42 g versus 44 g per 100 g.

More comparisons