LS Saucisson sec 32 tranches 100g vs LS Saucisson sec 32T - TSR 100g
Overall, LS Saucisson sec 32T - TSR 100g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
LS Saucisson sec 32 tranches 100g
LS Saucisson sec 32T - TSR 100g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | LS Saucisson sec 32 tranches... | LS Saucisson sec 32T - TSR 1... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 379 kcal | 393 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 4.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- LS Saucisson sec 32T - TSR 100g has 31% less salt (2.9 g vs 4.2 g).
Ingredients
LS Saucisson sec 32 tranches 100g
Viande de porc (origine : France), sel, lactose (dont lait), épices, dextrose, sucre, conservateurs : nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium.; ; ferments. 152 g de viande de porc ont été utilisés pour élaborer 100g de produit fini.
LS Saucisson sec 32T - TSR 100g
Viande de porc (origine : France), lactose (dont lait), sel, sucre, dextrose, épices, minéraux de mer (magnésium, calcium), conservateurs : nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium, chlorure de potassium ; ; ferments. 152 g de viande de porc ont été utilisés pour élaborer 100 g de produit fini.
FAQ
Which is healthier: LS Saucisson sec 32 tranches 100g or LS Saucisson sec 32T - TSR 100g?
Overall, LS Saucisson sec 32T - TSR 100g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
LS Saucisson sec 32 tranches 100g has fewer calories: 379 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
LS Saucisson sec 32 tranches 100g has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.