LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G vs LS Pavé au poivre 6T 100g - massif TRAD
Overall, LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G
LS Pavé au poivre 6T 100g - massif TRAD
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | LS saucisson auvergne LR 300... | LS Pavé au poivre 6T 100g -... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 373 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 5.4 g | 4.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G has 89% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- LS Pavé au poivre 6T 100g - massif TRAD has 15% less salt (4.6 g vs 5.4 g).
- LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G has 27% more protein (30 g vs 22 g).
Ingredients
LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G
Viande de porc (Origine : France), sel, lactose (dont lait),sucre, épices, dextrose, conservateurs : nitrate de potassium, nitritede sodium. Ferments. Boyau naturel de porc. 157g de viande de porc ont été utilisés pourélaborer 100g de produit fini.
LS Pavé au poivre 6T 100g - massif TRAD
Viande de porc (Oriqine France), sel, lactose, poivre (1,2%) dextrose, sucre, épices, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium, ferments
FAQ
Which is healthier: LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G or LS Pavé au poivre 6T 100g - massif TRAD?
Overall, LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
LS Pavé au poivre 6T 100g - massif TRAD has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
LS saucisson auvergne LR 300G has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.