Comparison

LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g vs Chorizo dulce

Overall, LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200gChorizo dulce
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 255 kcal 443 kcal
Fat 11 g 38 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 14.2 g
Sugars 1.9 g 0.2 g
Salt 4.8 g 3.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 37 g 25 g
Additives20
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g has 43% fewer calories (255 kcal vs 443 kcal).
  • LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g has 71% less fat (11 g vs 38 g).
  • LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g has 69% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 14.2 g).
  • Chorizo dulce has 89% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Chorizo dulce has 35% less salt (3.1 g vs 4.8 g).
  • LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g has 32% more protein (37 g vs 25 g).
  • Chorizo dulce is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g lists: Milk.

Ingredients

LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g

Viande de porc (Origine : France), sel, lactose (dont lait), vin, poudre de lait, arômes, dextrose de maïs, épices et plantes aromatiques; ; conservateurs : nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium; ; ferments. 187g de viande de porc ont été utilisés pour élaborer 100g de produit fini.

Chorizo dulce

Magro, paleta y panceta de cerdo, pimentón, ajo y sal. Tripa comestible natural

FAQ

Which is healthier: LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g or Chorizo dulce?

Overall, LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

LS Le Mathurin L'élancé 200g has fewer calories: 255 kcal versus 443 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chorizo dulce has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons