Comparison

LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g vs Les p'tites tranches Fumé

Overall, LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLS Le Mathurin - Le classiqu...Les p'tites tranches Fumé
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 267 kcal 315 kcal
Fat 11 g 16.5 g
Saturated fat 4.2 g 5 g
Sugars 1.9 g 2.1 g
Salt 5 g 5 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 39 g 39.4 g
Additives22
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g has 15% fewer calories (267 kcal vs 315 kcal).
  • LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g has 33% less fat (11 g vs 16.5 g).
  • LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g has 16% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 5 g).
  • LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g

Viande de porc (Origine : France), sel, lactose (dont lait), vin, poudre de lait, arômes, dextrose de maïs, épices et plantes aromatiques; ; conservateurs : nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium; ; ferments. 187g de viande de porc ont été utilisés pour élaborer 100g de produit fini.

Les p'tites tranches Fumé

Viande de porc, sel, _lactose_, dextrose, sucre, poudre de _lait_, vin, épices, conservateurs (nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium), arôme, ferments,

FAQ

Which is healthier: LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g or Les p'tites tranches Fumé?

Overall, LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g has fewer calories: 267 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

LS Le Mathurin - Le classique 200g has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons