LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl vs Iced tea
Overall, LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl | Iced tea |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 13 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl has 46% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 13 kcal).
- LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl has no fat, while Iced tea has 0.5 g.
- LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl has 43% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Iced tea has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Iced tea has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl
Eau, sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique, extraits de thé noir (1) (0,12%), jus de pêche à base de concentré (0.1%), arôme naturel, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, édulcorant : glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevia.(1) Certifié Rainforest Alliance. Pour en savoir plus : ra.org
Iced tea
Eaude source St Benoit (96%), sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique, extraitsde thé (1) (0.12 %), arôme naturel, jus de pêche à base de concentré(0,1%), arôme naturel de pêche avec autres arômes naturels, antioxydant :acide ascorbique.(1) Certifié Vérifié Rainforest Alliance. pour en savoir plus : ra.org
FAQ
Which is healthier: LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl or Iced tea?
Overall, LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 13 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
LOOK Thé pêche 6x33cl has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3 g per 100 g.