Comparison

Look Limonade Bouteille 1.5L vs Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l

Overall, Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientLook Limonade Bouteille 1.5LEau gazeuse aromatisee citro...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 26 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 4.3 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l has no calories, while Look Limonade Bouteille 1.5L has 26 kcal.
  • Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l has no sugar, while Look Limonade Bouteille 1.5L has 4.3 g.
  • Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Look Limonade Bouteille 1.5L

Eau de source Saint Benoit gazéifiée (96%), sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique, arômes naturels d'agrumes, arômes naturels.

Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l

Eau minérale naturelle gazeuse (source VERNET*) 99,5%, arôme naturel de citron avec autres arômes naturels. *Origine: Prades (07) France

FAQ

Which is healthier: Look Limonade Bouteille 1.5L or Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l?

Overall, Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 26 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Eau gazeuse aromatisee citron select ste marguerite 1,25l has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons