Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L vs LOOK FUN Citron 1.5L
Overall, Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L | LOOK FUN Citron 1.5L |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 12 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 7 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L has 67% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L has 31% less sugar (3.1 g vs 4.5 g).
Ingredients
Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L
Eau de source Saint Benoît gazéifiée (92%), jus d'orange à base de concentré (5%), sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, édulcorants : glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevia et acésulfame de potassium, arôme naturel d'orange avec autres arômes naturels, stabilisant : gomme de guar, colorant : bêta-carotène.
LOOK FUN Citron 1.5L
Eau de source St Benoit gazéifiée (91%), sucre, jus de citron à base de concentré 5%, extrait de citron, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, arôme naturel d'agrumes avec autres arômes naturels, édulcorant : glycosides de stéviol issus de Stévia, stabilisant : farine de graines de caroube, colorant : bêta-carotène.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L or LOOK FUN Citron 1.5L?
Overall, Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Look FUN Orange PET 1,5L has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.