Comparison

Lipton Ice Tea saveur pêche sans sucres vs Iced tea saveur pêche

Overall, Iced tea saveur pêche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLipton Ice Tea saveur pêche...Iced tea saveur pêche
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 1 kcal 1 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives75
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Iced tea saveur pêche has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Iced tea saveur pêche has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Lipton Ice Tea saveur pêche sans sucres

Eau,acidifiants (acide citrique, acide malique),extrait de thé noir⁽¹⁾ (0,12%),jus de pêche à base de concentré (0,1%),arômes,correcteur d'acidité (citrate trisodique),édulcorants (acésulfame-K, sucralose),antioxydant (acide ascorbique),⁽¹⁾ Certifié Rainforest Alliance. Plus d'informations sur ra.org. People and nature = l'humain et la nature.

Iced tea saveur pêche

Eau, jus de pêche à base de concentré 0,6%, acidifiant : acide citrique, extraits de thé noir* 0,12%, correcteur d'acidité : citrates de sodium, arôme naturel, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, édulcorants : acésulfame-K et sucralose. * Certifié Rainforest Alliance. Plus d'information sur ra.org.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lipton Ice Tea saveur pêche sans sucres or Iced tea saveur pêche?

Overall, Iced tea saveur pêche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lipton Ice Tea saveur pêche sans sucres has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 1 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lipton Ice Tea saveur pêche sans sucres has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons