Comparison

Lindt Chocoletti Lait praliné noisettes vs Lait Praliné Double Lait

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLindt Chocoletti Lait pralin...Lait Praliné Double Lait
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 558 kcal 530 kcal
Fat 35 g 29 g
Saturated fat 15 g 14 g
Sugars 48 g 56 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 3.1 g
Protein 6.4 g 6.3 g
Additives22
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lait Praliné Double Lait has 17% less fat (29 g vs 35 g).
  • Lindt Chocoletti Lait praliné noisettes has 14% less sugar (48 g vs 56 g).
  • Only Lindt Chocoletti Lait praliné noisettes lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Lindt Chocoletti Lait praliné noisettes

sucre, praliné _noisette_ (20%) (_noisettes_, sucre), beurre de cacao, poudre de _lait_, _noisettes_ (7%), pâte de cacao, _lactose_, matière grasse végétale (palme, karité), poudre de _lait_ écrémé, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), extrait de malt d'_orge_, _amandes_, arômes,

Lait Praliné Double Lait

Sucre, praliné (26 %) (sucre, NOISETTES (7%), AMANDES (4%), NOIX DE CAJOU (1%)), pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, LAIT écrémé en poudre, graisses végétales (palme, palmiste, karité), lactosérum en poudre (de LAIT), BEURRE concentré, émulsifiant (lécithines de SOJA), arômes, cacao maigre en poudre. PEUT CONTENIR AUTRES FRUITS À COQUE.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lindt Chocoletti Lait praliné noisettes or Lait Praliné Double Lait?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lait Praliné Double Lait has fewer calories: 530 kcal versus 558 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lindt Chocoletti Lait praliné noisettes has less sugar: 48 g versus 56 g per 100 g.

More comparisons