Comparison

Lindor Milcheier vs Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch

Overall, Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLindor MilcheierFriedel Schokoladenosterhase...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 623 kcal 544 kcal
Fat 47 g 32 g
Saturated fat 34 g 20 g
Sugars 42 g 56 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Protein 5 g 6 g
Additives01
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch has 13% fewer calories (544 kcal vs 623 kcal).
  • Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch has 32% less fat (32 g vs 47 g).
  • Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch has 41% less saturated fat (20 g vs 34 g).
  • Lindor Milcheier has 25% less sugar (42 g vs 56 g).
  • Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch has 17% more protein (6 g vs 5 g).
  • Only Lindor Milcheier lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Lindor Milcheier

Zucker, pflanzliches Fett (Kokosnuss, Palmkern), Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Vollmilchpulver, Magermilchpulver, Milchzucker, Butterreinfett, Emulgator (Sojalecithin), Gerstenmalzextrakt, Aromen.

Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch

Zucker, Vollmilchpulver (18%), Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Laktose, Süßmolkenpulver, Emulgator: Lecithine; Vanilleextrakt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lindor Milcheier or Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch?

Overall, Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Friedel Schokoladenosterhase aus Vollmilch has fewer calories: 544 kcal versus 623 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lindor Milcheier has less sugar: 42 g versus 56 g per 100 g.

More comparisons